|
|
||||
|
|
Statement of Rep. Christopher Shays
June 14, 2001
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) medical network has the potential to function as an indispensable
pillar of the nation's public health system. The question we address this
morning: Is that potential being realized in the VA effort to screen and test
veterans for hepatitis C infection? With
more than fifteen thousand providers at eleven hundred sites, the Veterans
Health Administration (VHA) will see and treat almost four million patients this
year. Those patients may be particularly vulnerable to the silent epidemic of
hepatitis C because so many veterans, particularly those who served in the
Vietnam era, may have been exposed to blood transfusions and blood-derived
products before the hepatitis C virus (HCV) could be detected. In
early 1999, the VA launched the HCV Initiative, setting a goal to screen and
offer testing to all veterans passing through VHA medical centers and clinics.
It was a responsible, but daunting, undertaking in response to a public health
crisis afflicting veterans at three to five times the rate of infection found in
the U.S. population as a whole.
In
three previous hearings on the hepatitis C effort, we heard of frustratingly
slow, but measurable progress as the decentralized VA health system struggled to
implement and fund the program consistently across twenty-two regional
networks. We heard persistent reports of inconsistent outreach, perfunctory
screening and limited access to testing and treatment. So we
asked the General Accounting Office (GAO) to visit a cross-section of VA
facilities to assess the reach and vitality of this important public health
effort. The GAO findings indicate the HCV initiative has failed to capture a
significant number of veterans who carry the hepatitis C virus. Those veterans
show no symptoms, do not know they are infected; but they need medical help to
protect their own health and the health of those around them. After
almost three years of attempting to implement this high priority initiative
across the VA system, access to screening remains inconsistent and limited.
Heavy-handed, invasive screening techniques at some VA facilities discourage
disclosure of HCV risk factors by patients. Many facility managers see HCV
screening and testing as an unfunded mandate, unaware Congress appropriated $340
million this fiscal year for the program. Due to poor VA communication with
regions and facilities, inadequate data systems to measure program performance,
and faulty budget estimates, more than half that amount will not be spent on HCV-related
care.
Adequately funded, the program still appears to lack focus. According to one
estimate, fewer than twenty percent of veterans using VA health care facilities
were screened or tested for HCV. Data recently obtained by VA indicates up to
forty-nine percent of VA patients may have been reached by the HCV Initiative
over the past two years. But to redeem the promise of the HCV Initiative, GAO
recommends VA screen ninety percent of regular VHA patients next year.
Reaching that target will require a far more sustained and aggressive approach
from VA leadership at all levels than has been evident to date. We hope to hear
today how the program impediments and weaknesses observed by GAO can be
addressed and how VA will miss no further opportunities to improve the public
health and the health of the nation's veterans. We
appreciate the skilled work of our oversight partners, the General Accounting
Office, in this ongoing review of the VA's hepatitis C program. All our
witnesses bring important perspectives, experience and expertise to this
discussion, and we look forward to their testimony.
|